Court Case

  • court doc“The City’s application of the 75/80 rule was clearly erroneous..”
  • “The City’s decision that lots 10 and 11 meet the 75/80 rule is REVERSED.”

– Decision of King County Superior Judge Spearman

Here are the main documents outlining the main arguments for each side in the court case.   There are actually hundreds of documents submitted for this court case.

The docs demonstrate how complicated, obscure and vague the loopholes are, and how very few people really have access to these laws.  These are the laws that affect your home, your neighborhood and your biggest investment.

I. Original Court Case

II. Request for Reconsideration

Members of Benchview believe we won based on the Judge’s decision.  But it’s not over.  Duffus’  asked the judge to reconsider her decision.  This costs the neighborhood even more money.

   A. Duffus Documents

  B. Benchview Response

  C. Duffus Reply

D. Judge’s Decision: Request Denied

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s